Hey ladies! Fight for your right to be a power-mongering, syncophant-rewarding asshole too!
Sarah Janacek seems to raise the hackles of knee-jerk reactionaries like few others. So her column about female candidates, particularly Amy Klobuchar, not being judged by some ridiculous double standard blew people's minds.
But before joining other feminists in applause because she's seen the light, let's take a moment for a Prog Prog annecdote;
- Have you ever tried to give a dog a pill? Shoving a small tablet into a puppy's throat can be a frustating experience. So what you should do is wrap it in something they like - watch them gobble it up!
Under the guise of feminism, Janacek slips in her poison. Since, "the supposed sin of hiring people who support their ambitions
," is good enough for, "Gov. Tim Pawlenty, Sen. Norm Coleman or Klobuchar's likely GOP opponent, U.S. Rep. Mark Kennedy," then gosh darn it, hiring people who support Klobuchar's ambitions is okay too.
- FYI: Hiring people who support ambitions = cronyism.
Why didn't she throw President Bush into that GOP lineup? Has Klobuchar ever said, "
Brownie, you're doing a heck of job" to one of her appointees? If she has, well according to Janacek, you must be an anti-feminist to even to call this into question.
Here's the point Janacek - The message to Klobuchar is: "DON'T USE YOUR OFFICE FOR POLITICAL GAIN AND CRONYISM! Janacek implies that somehow it is okay for Pawlenty, Coleman and Kennedy to give their toadies political appoitments- it's not- and that to deny Klobuchar the same ambititous "right" is somehow wrong. Really? I thought doing so would be striking a blow for clean and transparent government.
It's not okay if Republicans et. al. engage in cronyism, just as it was wrong and disasterous (in the case of FEMA) for President Bush to engage in it.
Prognosis Ludicrous - Cowed into thinking that opposing women is wrong no matter, the DFL endorses newly minted resident Ann Coulter over Al Franken in the 2008 Senate Race.
Prognosis Progressive - Listen to what all the candidates say. Blow past all the facts, figures and opinions and ask, "what will
you do about (fill-in the issue)?" If they can answer the question and you agree with candidate "A" more often than candidate "B", then vote for candidate "A"! You might just find yourself voting for Ford Bell or Becky Lourey. Being gender blind - that's what feminism is really about.